Visual RFC.
ALL RFCs / RFC 4193
Read the RFC ↗
RFC 4193 / LOCAL IPV6 ADDRESSING

Keep local addresses when sites or providers change

04

Independent local prefixes can survive an Internet Service Provider (ISP) change. When sites join, distinct prefixes help avoid renumbering, but routes still need configuration.

RFC 4193 · § 4.2EXAMPLE
3 / 3
Keep local addresses when sites or providers changeTwo separate example local /48s, then configured bidirectional inter-site routes without translating those addresses, then a separate provider-renumbering event preserving the local prefix. Distinct example IDs do not prove all generated IDs are unique; no VPN handshake or cryptography is depicted.Separate provider renumberingSite ASite Bfd12:3456:789a::/48fdab:cdef:1234::/48route to Site B /48route to Site A /48Provider prefix: old → newULA: fd12:3456:789a::/48 unchangedLocal path remains explicitly configured
03
Change the provider, keep local addressing.

Separate renumbering event: the provider-based prefix changes, while Site A’s local prefix and the configured local path stay the same. This is not a promise to preserve provider-address sessions.

Source for this drawing: RFC 4193 · Read RFC section 4.2 ↗

Protocol participantThreat or exceptionProtocol controlSimplified drawings · precise section references
New to this? Start hereA quick picture + helpful background

A message needs an address.

Think of a packet as a small addressed envelope. Devices pass it onward; transport protocols decide what delivery promises an application gets.

Helpful first, if these ideas are unfamiliar

These pictures are analogies to help you learn. The linked RFC explains the actual rules.

Related RFCs and changes

“Updates” changes part of an earlier RFC. “Obsoletes” replaces it. This list shows selected related documents.

KEY POINT

High probability of uniqueness helps interconnection; it is not a mathematical guarantee.

  • Each site can generate a separate /48 without a central assignment service. Section3.2.3 explicitly acknowledges possible collisions.
  • For distinct local prefixes, merging sites usually avoids ULA renumbering. Routes to each prefix still have to be configured; merely drawing a tunnel does not create them.
  • Changing provider-based global addresses does not itself change the local prefix. Existing communication using local addresses can remain independent of that provider renumbering.
DETAILS

These are two deliberately distinct illustrative prefixes, not a collision simulation. VPN means Virtual Private Network; secure tunnel establishment is outside this address-format RFC.

Read the RFC section ↗

All chapters in RFC 4193

Drawing view

Scroll the drawing to see every part. Playback controls stay above it.

RFC 9700 / CHAPTERS

Chapters

For full details, tables, algorithms, and exceptions, read the original RFC.

RFC status and corrections ↗