Visual RFC.
ALL RFCs / RFC 6454
Read the RFC ↗
RFC 6454 / THE WEB ORIGIN CONCEPT

Serialize without a path

05

Serialization turns an origin into text. Default ports disappear; non-default ports remain. ASCII and Unicode forms differ for international host labels.

RFC 6454 · § 6EXAMPLE
4 / 4
04
Show the Unicode alternative separately.

The same triple has Unicode serialization https://bücher.example. It is a display form defined by §6.1, not the ASCII field value.

Serialize without a pathThe same triple has Unicode serialization https://bücher.example. It is a display form defined by §6.1, not the ASCII field value.Unicode serialization separatelyTriple: https · xn--bcher-kva.example · 443convert A-label to U-labelhttps://bücher.exampleUnicode form · not the Origin field formUse ASCII when generating the field

Source for this drawing: RFC 6454 · Read RFC section 6 ↗

Protocol participantThreat or exceptionProtocol controlSimplified drawings · precise section references
New to this? Start hereA quick picture + helpful background

A message needs an address.

Think of a packet as a small addressed envelope. Devices pass it onward; transport protocols decide what delivery promises an application gets.

Helpful first, if these ideas are unfamiliar

These pictures are analogies to help you learn. The linked RFC explains the actual rules.

Related RFCs and changes

“Updates” changes part of an earlier RFC. “Obsoletes” replaces it. This list shows selected related documents.

KEY POINT

The Origin field uses ASCII serialization, not a display-friendly Unicode name.

  • A triple becomes scheme://host, followed by :port only when its port differs from the protocol default. No path, query, fragment or trailing slash is appended.
  • The Unicode form replaces A-label host components with their corresponding U-labels. The ASCII form keeps the host in ASCII; Origin field values MUST use this ASCII form.
  • A non-triple origin serializes as null in either form. Serialization is a representation, not proof of identity, trust or permission.
DETAILS

Chosen IDNA example: xn--bcher-kva.example corresponds to bücher.example. This is a fixed mapping illustration, not an IDNA validator or a recommendation to compare rendered names. The guide covers RFC 6454, including its host-processing assumptions.

Read the RFC section ↗

All chapters in RFC 6454

Drawing view

Scroll the drawing to see every part. Playback controls stay above it.

RFC 9700 / CHAPTERS

Chapters

For full details, tables, algorithms, and exceptions, read the original RFC.

RFC status and corrections ↗