Visual RFC.
ALL RFCs / RFC 8141
Read the RFC ↗
RFC 8141 / UNIFORM RESOURCE NAMES

Register a namespace before assigning real names

07

URN namespaces are managed too. Registration records the naming contract, rather than making any urn-looking string a valid assigned name.

RFC 8141 · § 6EXAMPLE
4 / 4
04
Reject a reserved formal NID.

A new formal NID beginning X- conflicts with the prohibition. Stop before registration; the removed experimental category does not authorize arbitrary real URNs.

Register a namespace before assigning real namesA new formal NID beginning X- conflicts with the prohibition. Stop before registration; the removed experimental category does not authorize arbitrary real URNs.Stop a reserved formal NIDProposed formal NID: X-picnicMUST NOT begin X-No registration in this rejected caseNo experimental X- escape hatch

Source for this drawing: RFC 8141 · Read RFC section 6 ↗

Protocol participantThreat or exceptionProtocol controlSimplified drawings · precise section references
New to this? Start hereA quick picture + helpful background

A message needs an address.

Think of a packet as a small addressed envelope. Devices pass it onward; transport protocols decide what delivery promises an application gets.

Helpful first, if these ideas are unfamiliar

These pictures are analogies to help you learn. The linked RFC explains the actual rules.

Related RFCs and changes

“Updates” changes part of an earlier RFC. “Obsoletes” replaces it. This list shows selected related documents.

KEY POINT

A namespace registration is different from assigning an NSS within it.

  • For a new formal registration, the proposed NID MUST NOT already be registered; it MUST be longer than two characters and MUST NOT start with urn-, X-, or two letters followed by a hyphen. Generic NID syntax is necessary but insufficient.
  • Informal namespaces are full-fledged registered namespaces. IANA assigns urn- followed by a positive decimal number without leading zeros, within the 32-character NID limit; the applicant does not pick that number.
  • The community path uses a completed template, discussion and Expert Review; anticipated standardization adds standards-body direction. A separate recognized-body fast track is available. Registration MUST state known interoperability issues and whether resolution is intended.
DETAILS

This chapter summarizes RFC 8141’s process rather than current IANA queue contents or an application form. It does not submit a registration, contact anyone, invent an experimental X- namespace, or imply expert review is always the fast-track authority. The full template and exceptions remain in §§6.2–6.4/Appendix A.

Read the RFC section ↗

All chapters in RFC 8141

Drawing view

Scroll the drawing to see every part. Playback controls stay above it.

RFC 9700 / CHAPTERS

Chapters

For full details, tables, algorithms, and exceptions, read the original RFC.

RFC status and corrections ↗