Visual RFC.
ALL RFCs / RFC 8200
Read the RFC ↗
RFC 8200 / MECHANISMS

Forward with explicit limits

06

Hop Limit changes at each forwarding node. Flow Label and Traffic Class express different treatment information.

Related RFCs and changes

“Updates” changes part of an earlier RFC. “Obsoletes” replaces it. This list shows selected related documents.

DIAGRAM§ 3 ↗
RFC 8200 · § 3EXAMPLE
3 / 3
Forward with explicit limitsA hop-limit field changes at each router until forwarding stops at zero.HOP LIMIT · WORKED EXAMPLE2source1router 10router 2Discard at zeroTraffic Class ≠ Flow Label ≠ Hop LimitMetadata is not confidentiality or peer authentication
03
Stop forwarding.

The next router discards the packet; Traffic Class or Flow Label does not override this limit.

Protocol participantThreat or exceptionProtocol controlSimplified drawings · precise section references
KEY POINT

Do not confuse forwarding metadata with a security guarantee.

  • A forwarding node decrements Hop Limit by one and discards a packet whose Hop Limit reaches zero.
  • Traffic Class and Flow Label are distinct fields; their detailed use is specified in other RFCs.
  • IPv6 has no base-header checksum; upper-layer checksums use an IPv6 pseudo-header.
DETAILS

IPv6 alone does not guarantee confidentiality or authenticated peers. Security mechanisms require their own protocols and configuration.

Read the RFC section ↗

Diagrams simplify the RFC. Read the linked sections for complete requirements.

Privacy
All chapters in this RFC
  1. Addresses identify interfaces
  2. Read the fixed IPv6 header
  3. Follow the next header chain
  4. Fit packets to the path
  5. Reassemble source fragments
  6. Forward with explicit limits
RFC 9700 / CHAPTERS

Chapters

For full details, tables, algorithms, and exceptions, read the original RFC.

RFC status and corrections ↗